Portfolio concentration
As of January 31, 2026 · N-PORT
Holdings
6
Top-10 weight
100.00%
Effective holdings
?
The number of equal-weight positions that would produce this portfolio's concentration (1 ÷ Herfindahl index). A 500-stock fund dominated by a few mega-caps might have only ~100 effective holdings.
4
Crowding
?
The value-weighted average number of funds that also own this fund's positions. High = consensus/crowded picks; low = holdings few other funds own.
20.9
Holdings
As of January 31, 2026 · N-PORT| # | Security | Ticker | Shares | Value | % of fund |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VANG-TB II-INV | — | 470,195,039 | $4.52B | 40.89% |
| 2 | VANG-T ST M-INV | — | 16,166,198 | $2.68B | 24.22% |
| 3 | VANG-TTL INT-INV | — | 215,381,696 | $1.90B | 17.17% |
| 4 | VANG-TO INT-INV | — | 72,781,890 | $1.86B | 16.86% |
| 5 | Vanguard Market Liquidity Fund | — | 736,110 | $73.61M | 0.67% |
| 6 | US ULTRA BOND CBT Sep25 | — | 121 | $464.40K | 0.00% |
| 7 | US ULTRA BOND CBT Sep25 | — | 313 | -$431.91K | -0.00% |
Machine-readable: JSON · Markdown. Programmatic access via the agent surface.