Portfolio concentration
As of February 28, 2026 · N-PORT
Holdings
92
Top-10 weight
22.21%
Effective holdings
?
The number of equal-weight positions that would produce this portfolio's concentration (1 ÷ Herfindahl index). A 500-stock fund dominated by a few mega-caps might have only ~100 effective holdings.
68
Crowding
?
The value-weighted average number of funds that also own this fund's positions. High = consensus/crowded picks; low = holdings few other funds own.
197.8
Holdings
As of February 28, 2026 · N-PORT| # | Security | Ticker | Shares | Value | % of fund |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 134,500,000 | $134.07M | 2.55% |
| 2 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 133,300,000 | $133.07M | 2.53% |
| 3 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 128,800,000 | $130.88M | 2.49% |
| 4 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 215,100,000 | $124.16M | 2.36% |
| 5 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 128,050,000 | $119.98M | 2.28% |
| 6 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 152,750,000 | $110.99M | 2.11% |
| 7 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 103,200,000 | $102.93M | 1.96% |
| 8 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 141,748,000 | $102.33M | 1.95% |
| 9 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 121,200,000 | $101.68M | 1.94% |
| 10 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 104,050,000 | $101.65M | 1.94% |
| 11 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 97,350,000 | $99.07M | 1.89% |
| 12 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 97,200,000 | $98.98M | 1.88% |
| 13 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 104,400,000 | $97.80M | 1.86% |
| 14 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 106,050,000 | $97.29M | 1.85% |
| 15 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 165,910,000 | $96.82M | 1.84% |
| 16 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 187,145,000 | $96.34M | 1.83% |
| 17 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 105,903,000 | $94.34M | 1.80% |
| 18 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 90,300,000 | $92.95M | 1.77% |
| 19 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 106,856,000 | $90.67M | 1.73% |
| 20 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 138,650,000 | $87.71M | 1.67% |
| 21 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 115,000,000 | $85.67M | 1.63% |
| 22 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 99,050,000 | $85.15M | 1.62% |
| 23 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 85,500,000 | $84.10M | 1.60% |
| 24 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 97,900,000 | $82.18M | 1.57% |
| 25 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 105,591,000 | $81.11M | 1.54% |
| 26 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 85,631,000 | $79.44M | 1.51% |
| 27 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 102,827,000 | $78.12M | 1.49% |
| 28 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 92,418,000 | $74.11M | 1.41% |
| 29 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 80,368,000 | $72.64M | 1.38% |
| 30 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 106,947,000 | $70.21M | 1.34% |
| 31 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 88,953,000 | $70.07M | 1.33% |
| 32 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 120,231,000 | $65.97M | 1.26% |
| 33 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 64,050,000 | $65.65M | 1.25% |
| 34 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 64,750,000 | $65.36M | 1.24% |
| 35 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 73,325,000 | $65.00M | 1.24% |
| 36 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 63,600,000 | $64.32M | 1.22% |
| 37 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 65,650,000 | $62.17M | 1.18% |
| 38 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 87,455,000 | $61.05M | 1.16% |
| 39 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 57,400,000 | $60.68M | 1.16% |
| 40 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 67,050,000 | $60.24M | 1.15% |
| 41 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 77,947,000 | $60.18M | 1.15% |
| 42 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 99,304,000 | $59.38M | 1.13% |
| 43 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 77,550,000 | $58.95M | 1.12% |
| 44 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 73,664,000 | $58.67M | 1.12% |
| 45 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 54,700,000 | $56.90M | 1.08% |
| 46 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 77,050,000 | $55.60M | 1.06% |
| 47 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 72,529,000 | $55.58M | 1.06% |
| 48 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 64,820,000 | $55.25M | 1.05% |
| 49 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 74,362,000 | $53.55M | 1.02% |
| 50 | US TREASURY N/B | — | 67,587,500 | $52.54M | 1.00% |
1 / 2
Next ›
Machine-readable: JSON · Markdown. Programmatic access via the agent surface.