Investment objective & strategy
As of Feb. 27, 2026 · prospectusObjective. The Frontier Asset Core Bond ETF (the Fund) seeks to provide high income consistent with the preservation of capital.
Strategy. The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded Fund (ETF). Under normal circumstances, the Fund invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in investment-grade fixed income securities. This investment policy may be changed by the Fund upon 60 days prior written notice to shareholders. The Fund operates in a manner that is commonly referred to as a fund of funds and obtains investment exposure to the asset classes described below primarily by investing in other ETFs. The Fund generally expects to hold approximately six to twelve underlying ETFs. For purposes of the Funds 80% investment policy, fixed income securities include securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, corporate debt securities, commercial paper, residential … The Fund is an actively managed exchange-traded Fund (ETF). Under normal circumstances, the Fund invests at least 80% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in investment-grade fixed income securities. This investment policy may be changed by the Fund upon 60 days prior written notice to shareholders. The Fund operates in a manner that is commonly referred to as a fund of funds and obtains investment exposure to the asset classes described below primarily by investing in other ETFs. The Fund generally expects to hold approximately six to twelve underlying ETFs. For purposes of the Funds 80% investment policy, fixed income securities include securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government, corporate debt securities, commercial paper, residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities, and inflation-linked securities (e.g., Treasury inflation-protected securities (TIPS)). The Adviser considers fixed income securities to be investment grade if they are rated in one of the four highest rating categories by a nationally recognized statistical ratings organization (NRSRO), such as S&P Global Ratings (S&P) or Moodys Investor Services, Inc. (Moodys), or determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality at the time of purchase. The Fund is managed to achieve broad exposure to the U.S. investment-grade fixed income securities market. The Fund does not target a specific weighted average maturity for its investments, either individually or in the aggregate. As a result, the Funds interest rate sensitivity may vary significantly over time. The Adviser makes investment decisions by seeking to identity and assemble a portfolio of ETFs that will achieve its desired asset allocation mix while also optimizing for positive risk-adjusted returns (i.e., alpha) relative to the general investment-grade fixed income market. To accomplish this, the Advisers investment team determines the Funds asset allocation mix and conducts ongoing research into the ever-growing universe of ETFs and their investment managers, populating a list of ETFs from which the Funds portfolio is constructed. The asset allocation mix for the Fund is determined through the use of a mean variance optimization process, which seeks to identify a combination of asset classes that is expected to maximize return for a given level of risk, by focusing primarily on expected returns, standard deviations (i.e., volatility as a measure of risk) and correlations of the different asset classes. The Advisers analysis and due diligence process for selecting prospective ETFs includes the following: ? Quantitative Analysis: The Adviser conducts single and multi-factor benchmark analysis to develop a return and risk profile for each ETF, selecting funds based on the apparent ability to generate absolute and relative returns, with an emphasis on funds that the Adviser believes demonstrate (i) strong risk-adjusted performance with some degree of consistency and (ii) relatively stable performance during turbulent markets. Single factor benchmarks represent one asset class, whereas multi-factor benchmarks include indices that track multiple asset classes. ? Qualitative Analysis: The Adviser conducts an evaluation of each ETFs underlying investment manager, seeking to understand the firms leadership structure, philosophy and investment decision making process. Weight is given to the depth and quality of the strategy underlying the managers investment thesis along with organizational factors including the managers compensation structure, board makeup, conflicts of interest and whether the portfolio managers of the ETF in question invest alongside clients. ? Manager Edge: The Adviser believes that ETF managers with a clear thesis for generating positive risk-adjusted returns are more likely to outperform overtime. Accordingly, the Adviser seeks to understand the inefficiencies each manager believes exist in the market, the likelihood that such inefficiencies will persist and whether the manager has a reasonable edge in exploiting them. Examples of market inefficiencies may include behavioral biases such as anchoring bias (relying too heavily on an initial piece of information when making decisions), confirmation bias (seeking out or giving more weight to information that supports original estimates) and overconfidence (displaying a hesitance to acknowledge potential errors in an initial analysis). In practice, these biases can lead to delayed or gradual revisions of earnings forecasts, even when significant changes in a companys fundamentals or external environment may warrant more immediate adjustments. The Adviser believes that a manager who understands these dynamics and puts in place processes to combat these biases may be in a better position to adjust their portfolio to incorporate new information, compared to managers who under-react to new information due to these biases. In conducting the qualitative and manager edge analysis described above, the Adviser relies on, among other publicly available sources of information, due diligence materials provided by managers as well as interviews conducted with such managers to discuss investment philosophy, processes, personnel and performance. Following this process, the Adviser will select ETFs on the basis of their ability to provide low-cost asset class exposure, as compared to other actively managed ETFs, and/or the ability to add value on either an absolute or risk-adjusted basis, while also taking into account the following factors to form its views on which ETFs to select for the Funds portfolio: market conditions, valuation metrics, risk profiles, and expected growth potential. The Adviser will sell ETFs for a variety of reasons, including the need to alter asset allocation exposures, to add ETFs that the Adviser believes are better positioned to add value as compared to existing holdings, and to remove ETFs that no longer meet the investment criteria for the Fund. The Adviser has engaged Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC to serve as trading sub-adviser (Sub-Adviser) for the Fund. The Sub-Adviser is responsible for trading portfolio securities for the Fund, including selecting broker-dealers to execute purchase and sale transactions or in connection with any rebalancing or reconstitution of the portfolio, pre- and post-trade compliance, and monitoring of Fund trading activity, subject to the oversight of the Adviser and the Board of Trustees.
Top holdings
As of Jan. 31, 2026 · N-PORT| Security | Ticker | Value | % of fund |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard Scottsdale Funds INTERMEDIATE-TERM TREASURY | VGIT | $11.14M | 25.05% |
| TCW FLEX INC ETF | — | $10.85M | 24.41% |
| JPMORGAN CORE PLUS BOND ETF MUTUAL FUND | — | $8.26M | 18.58% |
| REGAN FLOATING RATE MBS ETF MUTUAL FUND | — | $4.40M | 9.90% |
| WISDOMTREE FLOATING RATE TRE MUTUAL FUND | USFR | $4.36M | 9.80% |
| JPM ULTRA-SHT IN | JPST | $2.87M | 6.45% |
| iShares Investment Grade Systematic Bond ETF | IGEB | $2.40M | 5.39% |
Portfolio moves
Oct 31, 2025 → Jan 31, 2026How many positions this fund opened, exited, grew, trimmed, or left unchanged between its two most recent N-PORT snapshots — net changes between point-in-time reports, not a trade log.
Similar funds
Funds whose portfolios most overlap this one, by weight| Fund | Overlap | Net exp. |
|---|---|---|
| Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF · FOPC | 62% | 0.87% |
| Defined Duration 10 ETF · DDX | 25% | 0.25% |
| Defined Duration 5 ETF · DDV | 20% | 0.25% |
Advisers
| Firm | Role |
|---|---|
| Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC | Sub-adviser |
| Frontier Asset Management, LLC | Adviser |
Footnotes
- Expense ratio as of February 27, 2026, from the fund's prospectus.
- Net assets and holdings count as of January 31, 2026, from the fund's N-PORT filing.
- Total return for calendar year 2025, before tax and after fund expenses. As reported in the fund's prospectus performance bar chart.
Machine-readable: JSON · Markdown. Programmatic access via the agent surface.